香港三名六四烛光晚会组织者被判刑五年至七年三个月Hong Kong sentences three Tiananmen vigil organizers to terms of five to seven years

2026年9月11日，香港法院就香港市民支援爱国民主运动联合会（支联会）案判刑：前副主席邹幸彤被判监七年三个月，前主席李卓人被判监七年，前主席何俊仁被判监五年两个月。支联会同时被罚款150万港元。路透社、美联社和人权观察对上述日期、人物及刑罚的报道相互吻合。

邹幸彤和李卓人于2026年8月21日被裁定“煽动颠覆国家政权罪”成立；何俊仁已于同年1月认罪。三人曾领导现已解散的支联会，该组织长期举办维多利亚公园六四烛光晚会。报道显示，法院把组织呼吁“结束一党专政”等活动视为案件的重要依据。

香港当局表示，相关案件依据行为和证据处理，并非针对政治立场。联合国人权机构、国际人权组织及部分外国政府则认为判决把和平表达和纪念活动刑事化，并要求撤销定罪或判刑。本站将这些法律事实、政府立场和人权评价分别归属，不把任何一方的评价写成法院已经认定的事实。

核实说明：判刑日期、三名被告、各自刑期、罪名和对支联会的罚款已由相互独立的可靠来源交叉确认；本站尚未独立取得并认证完整判词，因此对法院全部论证、刑期计算及后续上诉状态继续跟进。

On September 11, 2026, a Hong Kong court sentenced three former leaders of the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China: former vice-chair Chow Hang-tung received seven years and three months, while former chairs Lee Cheuk-yan and Albert Ho received seven years and five years and two months respectively. The Alliance was also fined HK$1.5 million. Reuters, the Associated Press and Human Rights Watch independently report matching dates, names and penalties.

Chow and Lee were convicted on August 21, 2026 of “inciting subversion”; Ho had pleaded guilty in January. All three formerly led the now-disbanded Alliance, which organized Hong Kong’s annual Victoria Park candlelight vigils commemorating the June Fourth crackdown. Reports say the court treated calls to “end one-party dictatorship” as important to the case.

Hong Kong authorities maintain that national-security cases are decided on conduct and evidence rather than political views. UN human-rights officials, international rights groups and several foreign governments argue that the case criminalizes peaceful expression and commemoration and have called for the convictions or sentences to be quashed. This record attributes those legal facts, official positions and rights assessments separately.

Verification note: the sentencing date, defendants, prison terms, offense and fine are corroborated across independent reliable sources. China Rights Record has not independently authenticated the complete sentencing judgment, so the court’s full reasoning, sentence calculations and any appeals remain under review.